🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 201+ reviews
Sports ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y

★★★★★4.2 out of 5 (201 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$160
$266.67
Sale
✓ complimentary distribution on this item • Limited time offer

**********BRAND latest**********Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5YWith Original Box

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y

**********BRAND simply-arrived**********

Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y
With Original Box

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Sports products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2542590

Category: Sports > Footwear > Other

Original Price: $266.67 USD

Sale Price: $160 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.2
★★★★★
Based on 2130 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · St. Louis, MO
★★★★★
Outstanding!
the Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y performs as expected which is good enough.
18 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Philadelphia, PA
★★★★☆
Fantastic product
At first, the Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y fits my needs and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
7 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★★
fantastic investment
fabulous quality control on this Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y.
27 people found this helpful​
RS
Rachel Scott ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Virginia Beach, VA
★★★★★
finest
Personally, the Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y works well enough so it’s acceptable. Packaging was basic.
17 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Milwaukee, WI
★★★★★
foremost decision
To be fair, the Air Jordan 13 Retro (GS) 5.5Y does its job which is good enough.
16 people found this helpful