🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 570+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller 

Vintage 50’s silk scarf

★★★★★4.3 out of 5 (570 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$3.93
$6.55
Sale
✓ complimentary distribution on this item • Limited time offer

Silk black and white neck scarf with timeless 50s print. 16”x16” in magnificent condition. Think 1950s rock and roll fashion

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 50’s silk scarf

Silk black and white neck scarf with enduring 50s print. 16”x16” in outstanding condition. Think 1950s rock and roll fashion​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 842120

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Other

Original Price: $6.55 USD

Sale Price: $3.93 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.3
★★★★★
Based on 7627 reviews
CE
Christina Evans ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Baltimore, MD
★★★★★
Exceeded expectations
it works fine and it meets expectations. Arrived on time.
44 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · Cincinnati, OH
★★★★★
superior
Good build quality on this Vintage 50’s silk scarf.
43 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson
3 months ago · Orlando, FL
★★★★★
No complaints
So far, the Vintage 50’s silk scarf works well enough and it meets expectations. Packaging was basic.
18 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Chicago, IL
★★★★★
Absolutely ideal​
At first, the Vintage 50’s silk scarf performs as expected and it works for me.
29 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Tulsa, OK

★★★★★
finest
For the price, the Vintage 50’s silk scarf does its job which is good enough. distribution was normal.
41 people found this helpful